In addition to being one of those academic new mothers who thinks, talks, and writes a lot about figuring out the work family thing, I’m also one of those sociologists who collects data in a far away place featuring malaria, frequent food shortages, and an unsafe water supply. This summer will be our first shot at fieldwork as a family. I’m dreading the plane ride. I’m anticipating it being difficult at times – chaotic and unpredictable throughout. I’m anticipating a lot of swearing while hand-washing cloth diapers in the evening while trying to stay caught up on fieldnotes.  I can’t wait to test-drive my new status as mother; I know it will substantially alter the type of access I have, shedding new light on both the new project I’m starting and the older stuff I’m trying to publish. I can think of nothing better than pursuing the research I care very deeply about with my loved ones at my side. Did I mention that I can’t wait?

Most people would agree that in the context of causal conversation, it’s impolite to ask, “So what about [insert worst thing you can imagine happening to one's child here]? Aren’t you worried about that?” Yet as departure day nears, people are asking me this question multiple times a day. I’m afraid I’m going to lose it the next time somebody asks. Have I educated myself about the risks? Yes. Have GC and I had serious conversations about these that include planning for emergencies? Yes. Are health and illness randomly distributed? Do we have the resources to keep ourselves healthy? No. Yes. And sheesh; of all people, social scientists should know this cold! Logic combined with a little bit of statistical knowledge goes a long way in helping us justify the series of decisions surrounding our the decision to take the family to the field this summer. But I don’t feel compelled to argue my case here or to the individuals who casually ask me questions that would make any parent’s blood freeze.

I know the question is asked out of curiosity and without malice, but the question I hear is: “What kind of mother would expose her small children to unnecessary health risks for the sake of her career? Only a reckless, selfish, and very bad one! What kind of mother are you?” The problem is insensitivity to a pretty obvious type of role conflict – one that do-gooder liberal academics pride themselves on being attuned to.

Though I’ve had lots of helpful conversations with scholars and fellow adventurers who have made similar decisions, I’ve found surprisingly few resources and literature addressing this issue.  Fieldwork and Families offers some interesting perspectives on the problem but, as expected, no clear answers or even ready responses. I haven’t been able to find any blogs about traveling in remote-ish locations with little ones — probably because the demands of scholarship and family life in these settings leaves even less time for writing about it. With any luck, diaper washing and fieldnotes won’t totally sabotage my big plans to document some of the more personal and tedious aspects of our big adventure in service to the discipline. Happy Mother’s Day!

This started as a comment on NSP’s thoughts on tenure and public sociology but got lengthy….

NSP’s main point – the time to engage in public sociology is after tenure because spending too much time and energy on that while you’re junior might cost you tenure, and then you’ll never have the chance to make an impact as a leader in your field. There’s really nothing to argue with there. After tenure is clearly the optimal time for public engagement. But I still disagree with the “rational” approach of waiting until then to contribute here and there in a public way. (more…)

I know better than to try to figure out who authored a paper I’ve been asked to review. And I know not to circulate the “for peer review only” version to colleagues – even if the topic may be very interesting and relevant to them. But as New Soc Prof has pointed out, there is a substantial amount of grey area in the blind peer review process.

Another question: Are you allowed to mention a paper that you’ve reviewed in conversation or is all your reviewing activity supposed to remain top secret? This past week, I had to bite my tongue really hard not to say, “Oh, I just reviewed a paper about this. The authors found…..”  It was totally relevant to the conversation, but I was afraid of breaching the Reviewers’ Code, which I less-than-fully understand.

One of the best things about being a faculty member is the privilege of having library books delivered to your office. Rather than keeping a running list of books I want to read, I’ve started submitting requests to the library as they come up; I can always pull something I’ve been meaning to read off of that pile when I want a change of pace. I just finished one of the books on that pile – The Price of Privilege: How Parental Pressure and Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of Disconnected and Unhappy Kids by Madeline Levine. About 30 pages into the book I thought, “I wonder why I requested this book – it’s not the sort of thing I normally read.” It was interesting, so I kept reading. Finished the book a few days later – about two weeks ago. But ever since I finished it I have been wondering why I might have put that book in my queue. Did I hear an interview with the author on NPR? Somebody recommended it? Did I think I might cite it for something? I just realized that the book I meant to request was Soares’s The Power of Privilege: Yale and America’s Elite Colleges. Mystery solved. I think this is my first accidental reading incident.

Last week I received a rejection from a journal with a very efficient electronic submission system. This was the second time the paper has been rejected, so I was feeling more than a little disappointed. I forwarded the decision to my co-author with a note that said something along the lines of: “shit, shit, shit. this is a decent paper, though. we’ll find a home for it eventually.”

Except that I didn’t forward it to my co-author. I hit “reply” and the email went straight to the editor. I didn’t realize this until I received a very kind email from him the next day, lamenting the fact that I was upset by the decision. Careless. Embarrassing. Unprofessional. A mistake I won’t make again.

Any advice on writing book reviews? I’m trying to crank out my first one. Have read the book. Have read enough book reviews to see that there is a formula to these things. Anything else I should know?

kristinab has done the whole discipline a solid – acting on the idea that a wiki with current info on what’s going on at the various journals would be helpful for making decisions about where to send manuscripts. When deciding where to send my own papers, I usually spend about 19 emails inquiring about turn-around times, perceived fairness of the editorial decision, quality of the reviews, etc. Consolidating this type of information at sociojournals has the potential to be a great resource for all of us. Thanks, KB!

Edited: The password for accessing socijournals is “fromscatter”

During my last visit to the midwife she asked me if I was still working, to which I replied “yes.” I’ve been going to campus less and less frequently but have been trying to get manuscripts out and clear my desk (and calendar) as completely as possible for at least the next six weeks. “You’ll have this baby when you stop working,” she told me. That didn’t really sink in until now – now that I’ve passed my EDD*, am ready to post an eviction notice, and am lacking any sign that this baby’s arrival really is imminent. Now I’m realizing that what she may have been saying is: “You’re NOT going to have this baby UNTIL you stop working, and this is something you should take seriously.”

I’m no workaholic, but I realize that I truly don’t know how to stop. Saying that out loud sounds so much more, well, sick than I think I really am. But this career is wacky. What counts as “work” is fuzzy, and I’m not the best with my boundaries in the first place. Does returning email count? Do I need to switch out all the academic books and journals from my reading pile for the fun stuff I had hoped to get to over break? Set a May due-date for the manuscript that’s on-deck and a July one for the one that’s in the hole and just stop thinking about both of them?

It’s not just academia that’s like this. My friends who work in other sectors have fuzzy boundaries too (filmmakers, writers, artists, designers, computer programmers, finance gurus, sales people…), so I know that it’s part of a larger shift and not really a sector-specific problem. And the whole thing isn’t news to me – it’s the entire basis of the GTD system and lots of other productivity guidelines I try to follow. But this is the first time I’m facing an external (well, internal) motivation to shut things down professionally in a meaningful way, and I do think academia is a particularly hard area to do this in – if only because there is so much overlap between professional and personal habits like reading and writing routines.

This is a pretty particular set of circumstances, and anybody who doesn’t strongly believe in a body/mind connection would probably just roll their eyes. But the applications of knowing you’re capable of turning things off – if and when you need to – might be much broader. The fact that I don’t really know how to start stopping is alarming me. Suggestions welcome.

* Many of you already know that I don’t believe in due dates but have opted for a 95% confidence interval. I’m not ready to publicize the bounds but will tell you that I’m nearing its right tail. Since I like to think of myself as “perfectly normal in every way,” going past the right bounds will either destroy my faith in statistics or force me to reassess my understanding of self (the latter being the more unlikely of the two possibilities.)

Brightening up an otherwise blah day with “Maxim Articles Re-Written as Sociology Papers.” Thanks to GGC for sending me the link!

I received the evaluations of my Research Methods class (first time teaching) today. Overall, they weren’t nearly as bad as I had been expecting. Two students wrote some pretty biting comments, but two students also went and complained to the chair about me, my class, my policies, etc. so that’s not much of a mystery. One student wrote: “I learned a lot from this class and enjoyed it. Thought you were fair throughout. It seemed to me that there was a lot of complaining about our midterm and other things, but I think you handled it very well, and gave us opportunities to recover. Thanks.” Awwwwww.

But the BEST thing was the handwritten card I just happened to receive on the very same day my evals came in from a gem of a student (with different handwriting from the one mentioned above) who is in her fifth year. She wrote to say that I was the first professor to have taken the time to sit down with her, ask about her future plans, and get to know her, and that she really appreciated it. Now that doesn’t bode well for the typical undergrad experience at my university, but made the nasty comments much easier to swallow.

A few things students really seemed to like (and that pleased me):
- Enjoyed the time we spent critiquing real research methods. The book got old.
- The assignments built on one another to get us to the final project. That was great.
- She gave really interesting examples and you could tell she tried to find stuff we would like.

Comments to blow off:
- The grading was way too hard
- I had never failed an exam before this class
- The quizzes were too hard
- The assignments were too hard

Comments to thoughtfully consider*:
- You assumed we already knew stuff we didn’t know.
- The lectures covered a lot of material and went too fast, especially at the beginning of the semester.

*More on this topic coming soon