In addition to being one of those academic new mothers who thinks, talks, and writes a lot about figuring out the work family thing, I’m also one of those sociologists who collects data in a far away place featuring malaria, frequent food shortages, and an unsafe water supply. This summer will be our first shot at fieldwork as a family. I’m dreading the plane ride. I’m anticipating it being difficult at times – chaotic and unpredictable throughout. I’m anticipating a lot of swearing while hand-washing cloth diapers in the evening while trying to stay caught up on fieldnotes. I can’t wait to test-drive my new status as mother; I know it will substantially alter the type of access I have, shedding new light on both the new project I’m starting and the older stuff I’m trying to publish. I can think of nothing better than pursuing the research I care very deeply about with my loved ones at my side. Did I mention that I can’t wait?
Most people would agree that in the context of causal conversation, it’s impolite to ask, “So what about [insert worst thing you can imagine happening to one's child here]? Aren’t you worried about that?” Yet as departure day nears, people are asking me this question multiple times a day. I’m afraid I’m going to lose it the next time somebody asks. Have I educated myself about the risks? Yes. Have GC and I had serious conversations about these that include planning for emergencies? Yes. Are health and illness randomly distributed? Do we have the resources to keep ourselves healthy? No. Yes. And sheesh; of all people, social scientists should know this cold! Logic combined with a little bit of statistical knowledge goes a long way in helping us justify the series of decisions surrounding our the decision to take the family to the field this summer. But I don’t feel compelled to argue my case here or to the individuals who casually ask me questions that would make any parent’s blood freeze.
I know the question is asked out of curiosity and without malice, but the question I hear is: “What kind of mother would expose her small children to unnecessary health risks for the sake of her career? Only a reckless, selfish, and very bad one! What kind of mother are you?” The problem is insensitivity to a pretty obvious type of role conflict – one that do-gooder liberal academics pride themselves on being attuned to.
Though I’ve had lots of helpful conversations with scholars and fellow adventurers who have made similar decisions, I’ve found surprisingly few resources and literature addressing this issue. Fieldwork and Families offers some interesting perspectives on the problem but, as expected, no clear answers or even ready responses. I haven’t been able to find any blogs about traveling in remote-ish locations with little ones — probably because the demands of scholarship and family life in these settings leaves even less time for writing about it. With any luck, diaper washing and fieldnotes won’t totally sabotage my big plans to document some of the more personal and tedious aspects of our big adventure in service to the discipline. Happy Mother’s Day!
May 15, 2008 at 1:16 am
You guys never followed the “traditional” path. I think it’s wonderful that you are taking the whole family for fieldwork. Hey, with all the BPA scares in baby bottles lately, and who knows what else, getting away to a genuinely organic, almost pesticide free-locale sounds like something you’ll see at a $100,000 a month rate for new posh moms in a few years. I say “well done!”.
May 15, 2008 at 10:42 pm
I’m not completely surprised that academics have ignored this issue — academics like to avoid the real complications of having small children in many ares of our professional lives. I’m wondering, though, if missionaries might have heard similar comments and share some of the same struggles. Do they have any helpful blogs? Either that, or this is an excellent question for Dear Prudence — I’m always on the lookout for something to ask her…
May 17, 2008 at 6:09 pm
a few missionary blogs have been helpful for practical preparations – lots of info on malaria, vaccinations, nutrition, and diapering. but the missionary’s entire endeavor is grounded in taking risks – culminating in a willingness to die for what they believe in. risking their children’s health for the glory of the kingdom only adds to their stock in the eyes of their supporters. that sentiment doesn’t translate particularly well to the secular academic.
the idea of packaging non-toxic getaways to remote locations for the lucky few is simultaneously unbelievable and, well, totally believable. i predict this makes the NYT as a “trend” within 12 months!